Sunday, November 13, 2011

What Should Have Been Voted to Amend to the Texas Constituion Last Tuesday Election Would Have Sent Shockwaves Nationwide

             It was a useless election last Tuesday in Texas. They had ten propositions to amend to the Texas Constitution to be up for a vote by the people. The amendments were a bunch of legal jargon and unfamiliar terms. They really had nothing to do with the pressing needs of Texans. I had seen amendments about Water districts and School Districts with a bunch of terms that did not make sense. I mean it was a bunch of useless initiatives that would have done nothing to meet the needs of Texans. When I see confusing terms and alien words not easy for the average person to understand to make an informed choice. One thing I learned it is to empower government and not the people.

             What should have been on the ballot since the State Senate did not have the courage and guts to defy the Justice Department. The TSA anti groping bill should have put on the ballot. Why, because they people of Texas would have spoken loud and clear about the TSA. They would have told Obama to bring it on, if his goons in the Justice Department threatened a no fly zone over Texas. Texans would have spoken their mind at the ballot box. It would have won by a landslide that even Diebold machines could not flip the vote. The vote would be overwhelming crossing all ideologies and political party lines. If the people voted, "yes" overwhelmingly to make it criminal for Federal Agents to grope a person without a search warrant signed by a judge and not be put into the body scanners that are not safe. Would have the TSA shaking in their boots.

             I sense the TSA is going to cause Obama a major political defeat real soon because they have over reached. The TSA abuse will be a chain reaction where the White House will crater and implode on itself. The people want to be left alone. They are tired of getting treatment like criminals when they go into the airports and now they are moving onto the highways. People do not want to be bothered doing day-to-day activities. If the people were to vote on the TSA in Texas, it would be a major blow against tyranny. They would vote to throw them out if it was on the ballot. If there is anyone in the other several states, want to take on the TSA using states rights. Someone needs to step forward and get signatures to have it amended to their state constitutions to throw out the TSA. It is time to let the people speak and not the weak-kneed politicians that are not leaders, but useless panty waste.

            We have to find a way to let the TSA know, the will of the people will not be ignored and the voters will not tolerate no more abuses by the TSA anymore. We need to start putting it on the state ballots as many state we can. If one state wins, that will send shockwaves nationwide.


  1. Jesus Christ, hire a freaking editor if you're not going to take the time to write in the English language. You'll never be taken seriously until you do.

  2. We don't need an Amendment. We just have to ENFORCE US Constitution. Repeal & Prosecute Party

  3. Maybe you should have been complaining when Bush signed the Patriot Act. It is 342 pages of stuff that none of the congressional types read because it was locked up in their offices after the anthrax scare. The anthrax scare came out of a scientist at Ft. Detrick so you can theorize why the piece of legislation got passed.

  4. There was no Congressional Debate or public comment before Patriot Act was passed. Repeal & Prosecute Party

  5. The first response is all too true, whoever wrote this article needs a competent editor. Your grammer is functional, but the mistakes you fail to correct before posting is, in itself, harmful to your cause of public education.

    What makes it worse is that the problem is systemic in a very repetitive way. Until you get your problem fixed, you are mostly wasting this website.


  6. Congrats on your awesome blog. It is a favorite and I check back often. You even have your own assigned enemy agent.. 'Greg', he has so many names and anonymous of course.

    Yes greg, you bore everyone with your grammar nazi whining on every story.

    We will keep reading.
    Nothing says you made it like having your own live-in counter intel troll.

    You are hated by all the right people.

    Keep up the great work.

  7. As a topic, it really stands alone for a long debate, but the concept is this:

    Do people 'change and learn' and why do they?

    The answer is NO! People do not change or learn.
    Do some people change and learn? YES! But the issue is why? They change and learn because it is in their ENLIGHTENED NATURE TO DO SO.

    What does this mean?
    This means: take any one of the endless whiners,
    the whiner says, "I need grammar."
    the whiner says, "I need spelling."
    the whiner says, "I need a name on the post; anonymous people are cowards; without a random made up name, the message has no meaning."
    the whiner says, "If you refuse to meet my DEMANDS ( you demand ) you COMMAND US, to write or think or behave as YOU COMMAND.. and if we refuse.. you will do whatever.

    That personality type is a common idiot. That is not an insult. It is fact. The idea is: IF YOUR BABY DEMANDS ARE GRANTED.. you will then 'become honest, intelligent, thoughtful' whatever.. you will become WHAT YOU ARE NOT.. if your demands are met.

    Will you? Will you CHANGE, if your demands are met?

    No. You lied.

    It is that simple.
    You already are what you are and you will always remain what you are. You are exactly like those uneducated trash who become cops. This cop argues this, "I am doing unlawful crime to you. If you submit and help me perform unlawful crime on you - I will then become honest cop."

    It's a lie. Duh.

    You won't become honest, interesting, thoughtful, useful, insightful, or anything else. You won't become something else, when your baby ass demands are met.

    SO SO SO SIMPLE. You can break down this vast complex topic into one line.

    You don't become a great person after your whiny demands are met.

    In fact, when YOU MAKE WHINY DEMANDS? You are the one who is dismissed as a meaningless idiot.

    Take your whiny demands... and shove them DEEP DEEP DEEP into your ass. And notice how this doesn't work. You make a pussy demand. You are told NO! Your demand is refused. What do you next?

    A whiny pussy.

    Take your demands and fuck them deep in your ass.
    I piss on your demands.

  8. it refuses an editor, so let it stand as it is. Ignorance is bliss after all

  9. No, you lost that debate.
    PURE REALITY: nothing subjective.

    I did come to THIS blog. - fact
    I did read this blog. - fact
    I did read HIM and I did read YOU. - fact

    He entertained me.
    You did not entertain me. You won't EVEN LIE you entertained me. You whined and complained. NOT EVEN YOU found you insightful or entertaining. You whined like an ugly girlfriend.

    What interests me, I find lower IQ lower humans SO INTERESTING!

    I would love to be able to surgically remove your smaller brain and attach it to a machine that decode it.

    I am aware you are INCAPABLE of knowing what I am talking about.

    You were asked, EDIT IT WHY?
    You were asked.

    Give me a great answer...
    it would what?
    Make you interesting when you whine? no.
    Make you comment in some way instead of whine? no.
    The message would have more meaning? no.

    Look how COOL your idiot mind is.
    He had something to say about the world.
    You whined about editing, therefore he is dumb and you are smart.

    If you are so smart? Why don't you have a blog? Or, why are you never interesting?

    I grasp you are too dumb to discus this with me.
    I DO HAVE YOU! I do.. .have you..
    I have a you.. that uses grammar to be whiny and useless..

    You did prove how WORTHLESS you are.
    Grammatical YOU.. is not worth a wad of used toilet paper.

    yes, kicking the TSA out of Texas would have passed with the voters and it would have SMASHED the NWO a heavy blow with many long term consequences.

  10. Selibrate dumb down gramar. And spelling amen. Gramatic winers need to be beetin.

  11. Well Joe, it has been covered.
    I am a genius writer, so - I am more qualified than anyone to comment on the topic. You will never write as good as me. Thus, what could you ever hope or dream to do for me? You could be informative or interesting.

    Well, Joe, will you be informative or interesting?
    No. Amazing how it takes TWO LETTERS to define you as a human being; no.

    I do understand what your form of stupidity is. Have you seen that WW2 show 'Band of Brothers'?
    In Band of Brothers, the commander of Easy Company was great at training students. In combat, that guy was a useless idiot. This is what is wrong with people like you, Joe. You are probably the perfect person to teach 4th graders. When it came to teaching little children basic grammar, you are the master. When it came to actually WRITING ANYTHING: prose, poetry, novel, critique, truth news - you name it.. you are a wandering idiot clusterfuck.

    The other issue of you, is 'Sour Grapes'. [True Story] once while telling the Aesop fable of Sour Grapes, an atheist HONESTLY AND GENUINELY REPLIED, "But.. I am not a grape." Haha, true story. Anyway, you and your kind, really did come to, want to, try to, and intend to - say something intelligent. You really did. As explained, your ability to teach 4th grade, does not include the ability to actually think or write on a competitive level. So, when you were ACTUALLY UNDER PRESSURE to perform as a writer, you utterly failed. You were 100% failure as a writer and intellectual. So, you did the only thing you are capable of; you insulted the grapes you came to eat, because you are too inferior to reach them.

    Look at me: I can write thousands of words at will, continuously; I can have a point, make a point, have something to say.

    What should you notice?

    Two kinds of people basically.

    1) You MAKE THINGS
    2) You WHINE ABOUT what others make

    I make things.
    You can't make anything, Joe.
    You exist to WHINE about your betters.

    You might be thinking, you idiot losers constantly think to yourself that things are 'like'. It is 'like' I am pissing on your face. It is 'like' I think of you as an insect.

    It is not like.

    I REALLY DO PISS ON YOUR FACE AND THINK OF YOU AS A LOWER INSECT. I really do. There is nothing like about it.

  12. So, thanks Realman for having something to say.
    I greatly enjoy your informative work.

    I would not wipe my ass with these other zero-talent grammar dweebs.

  13. Man, that is some funny s**t!

  14. Yes, Joe. It is.
    You made my point perfectly.
    God, I wish I could inject you with a drug, that you could experience being smart for once in your life.

    Seriously: answer this:

    "Do you believe, I was waiting for you, to write something long, deep, intelligent, and full of substance?"

    Or, was I waiting for you to babble some idiot emotional one-liner?

    Can you guess?

    That's not the joke. The joke is, you can't see it. In your tiny idiot mind, you are actually BLOWN AWAY BY HOW SMART YOU ARE!

    Joe, we are in no danger, of you kicking ass.
    You can't.

    You did exactly what I said you would do.
    You make WHINY COMMENTARY, about others who can perform.

    you have never performed once in your life.
    How could I mock your thoughts? You have no thoughts.

  15. We'd had this debate before, but I continue to be amazed by it. What possible harm can their be in having someone edit his work before he submits it? Honestly, what's the harm?

    Even if you don't think that he needs to improve his grammar, what's the harm in making it even better? Even if you think spellcheck isn't important, how does performing a spellcheck harm his essays?

    I guess what I'm saying is, why not strive for excellence? If Realman is saying stuff that people want to hear, that's the tough part. He's done most of the work. So isn't it just icing on the cake for him to say it well? Why settle for only basic understanding? Why not work to continually improve?

    I just don't see why people are excusing his work. It can be improved, so why not try to do so? Why settle for good enough? Why should ANYONE, EVER, settle for good enough?

  16. If you don't like what he writes it is very simple don't read what he writes. Move along and read well crafted articulate bullshit and then smile =]

  17. Roland the FBI provocateur, mainstream media is all grammatically accurate PROPAGANDA LIES. The quality of grammar makes PROPAGANDA LIES true? Life is measured in hours. Edit work is not work 1sec of life. He needs to go write his NEXT STORY. Roland, you can barely read - so I agree with you on that level. YOU CAN BARELY READ, so this 'reading thing' is very taxing on you.

    I can speed read like a college literature professor. I don't even notice the grammar anymore. I can't read BADLY ENOUGH to notice. I subconsciously absorb meaning and content. I don't even look at individual words. Where as you? YOUR LIPS STILL MOVE as you struggle to sound out each word. We are from different worlds, Roland the FBI provocateur.

  18. GOOD post!
    THANK YOU for the free speech zone.
    YOU DO have all the RIGHT enemies you can hear their THIRD WORLD sintax and POOR english
    ,HMMM sounds a lot like what you may hear on the street in ISRAEL! Where english IS a second language, maybe you can out these guys if you use a little YIDISH, to decieve and misdirect them.