What Part of" No Person Shall Be Deprived of Life, Liberty and Property without Due Process of Law" The US Senate Does Not Understand?

                 Well it looks like the US Senate might have to be given Michael Badnaricks Constitution class or a joint session of congress hearing a lecture from Judge Andrew Napolitano on the bill of rights. The truth is, if this bill gets singed into law. The pendulum can swing in the other direction were even a President can have a member of congress, senators, state legislatures, governors and judges arrested who stands in the way of his agenda. Cause their political enemies to disappear. The bill they might pass depriving the right of due process can be used against the President's political enemies who hold office, Once detained, they have no legal recourse. There can be unintended consequences the politicians in Washington they never expected. No one us safe if S-1867 becomes law.

                 This nation fought a king over these types of abuses. Even in a tyranny, no one is safe. Not even the most loyal subjects. Everybody is fair game if the President can bypass the right of due process of Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, the right to confront their accusers, the right to see a lawyer and the speedy public trial. We cannot trust the president to hold to keys to the jail house without accountability. When the US government's executive branch is putting people on no fly list, taking down websites and denying the right to keep and bear arms without a judge and jury. The truth is, we cannot trust one branch of government with powers judge ,jury and executioner. There has to be a check on powers from the other branches of goverment and the several states. Which comes to the conclusion, why should we trust the President to determine who is guilty or innocent by his own discretion when he has abused his power for the past three years?

                 What I will tell the US Senators who publicly took an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. There is no circumstances to justify such legislation. There is no real national emergency to vote yes on S-1867. "No person shall be deprived" means US citizen and non US citizen. No matter what the crime is and what the evidence is against them. It extends to illegal aliens crossing the border illegally. Even a terrorist. We prosecuted domestic terrorist groups in the 1970s without a Patriot Act or giving the President extra judicial powers to use the military to go out out and arrest them. The right of due process was preserved, the accused had a public trial, a jury of their peers, and a lawyer present to defend the accused. Many were found guilty and went to prison. The system worked putting away terrorist. What make it any different today?

                  The reason why the US Senate is making a bold move is because they are getting ready to take down the country. If they do not try to oppress the American people. Most of them will face arrest. They do not have any real justification for such a move, but to send a chilling effect to the people not to speak out. They know their time is short and they are trying to put off the inevitable day of reckoning. The US Senators might learn the hard way of the meaning "no person shall be deprived" when they might lose their right to due process because this power they voted yes for was put into the wrong hands. What goes around comes around.