Monday, September 19, 2011

Using the Power of the Jury to Grind the DUI Scam to a Halt

                 One of my close acquaintances just got a DUI because she had a glass of wine seven hours earlier before a meal. Just based on the admission, she was arrested for DUI because she failed the field sobriety test even though the breathalyzer she blown a .02. She is looking at spending money she cannot afford on fines, schools and counselors. She did not harm no one or destroy a persons property. She worked hard in her profession as a nurse, now she is at risk of losing what she worked for over a scam and a over zealous government. The police knew she was not even buzzed. But they are ordered to go out to generate revenue for the system. not protect the people.

                 This is not the first person I seen get a DUI who was not drunk. They go through unnecessary financial hardships because of it. If they could not afford to go to these expensive schools and counselors. They do not have the money to pay the fines and have to spend time in the county jail. When they get released they still have to go through the process if they ever want to drive again. Once a person is in the system, it is hard to get out of it. Many people should not have to suffer anymore from this scam. The truth is many Judges, Politicians and Prosecutors are the same people who own these schools and counseling centers. They make money off this scam, When they were caught they would put it in the wives names or children's name. Still can you small a rat yet? Is there something in the Constitution not using the office for profit?

                Why so many people get screwed by this scam is because they fail to use the rights available to them under their state and Federal constitutions. That is the right to be tried by a Jury of your peers. it is time to take your life out of the hands of a judge and back into the hands of the people.  When people in government use their office of profit at the expense of us. Expect corruption and injustices to follow. There have been Judges in Pennsylvania who was found out getting kickbacks for sending juveniles to jail for profit over small offenses. Many of these judges and Politicians own stock in private prison systems. It is America's disgrace we have more people incarcerated than most countries combined. When a person accused of a DUI goes before a judge. That Judge might own the school he will order the person to attend paying expensive fees. You may not have been drunk or even buzzed. To them you are new business to them. They are not interested in justice.they want your money.

                This is why I say, ask for a jury trial when charged with a DUI. If you know you were not intoxicated. Let the jury decide your guilt or innocence. The system may make an excuse why you cannot have a jury trial. Do not give up. If we start asking for Jury trail after being charged with a DUI or DWI. Chances are we can bog down the courts. I would ask for a jury trial for the reason is. This can cause unnecessary hardships for you or your family. Many people in government make money off this scam because people too long decided to allow the judge to determine our fate than the people.   It is time we stop allowing government people on the side profit off our gullibility. We had our rights violated when we were stopped violating our fifth amendment right to blowing into a tube to a field sobriety test without the assistance of council. If we refused, we had our license taken away for exercising our rights not to do anything that can self incriminate ourselves. Do not allow them to take away your right to have a trial by jury. The jury box is a veto on bad law and a over zealous court system. We either use our rights or lose them. What will it be? Will you be scammed by the courts or be free form the injustice system?         

15 comments:

  1. This is generally very good advice. However, in some states, like Hawaii, DUI has been "reduced" to a petty misdemeanor to eliminate the right to jury trial. Altho jail time cannot now exceed 30 days, all the other disabilities of a dui conviction remain with NO jury rights! Another thing to realized is that if most everyone demands a jury trial, the state cannot provide enough judges and courtrooms in time to give them a so-called "speedy trial" which can result in a dismissal. William "Pili" McGrath (esq.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not only is DUI a scam, hospitals and law enforcement are using denatured medical alcohol on patients claiming patients are drinking in order for hospitals not to get stuck with the bill. Under the bankruptcy code 523(a)(9) you cannot discharge debt if due to drugs or alcohol.
    Dead people cant say they are not drinking. policeabuse.weebly.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why would she admit to a cop that she had a glass of wine? It's none of his goddamn business. Besides, nowadays, lying to a cop is not only a virtuous act it is a necessity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Blame the morans at MAAD. They get a piece of the federal pie for every DUII generated in this country.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Have you had a loved one killed by a drunk driver that had no business driving? Until you answer yes to that...you really need to s.t.f.u.!

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Have you had a loved one killed by a drunk driver that had no business driving? Until you answer yes to that...you really need to s.t.f.u.! "

    You need to take your own advice and s.t.f.u. as you clearly did not read the editorial.

    so s.t.f.u.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Have you ever had a loved one killed by a bald person? Arrest them all! I believe no one should ever go to jail for an injury they "might" commit. And that's all DUI is. The crime of "maybe". Do we wait for an injury to occur before we arrest someone? Yes. Otherwise its nothing more than a "pre-crime" arrest. Just because its a popular one, its still wrong. And yes, the world will be more dangerous. A free world always is. I would find any man innocent, even if he blew .30, if no harm occurred. My sympathies with those that lost loved ones, but unless the man on trial is the one that harmed them, then he's innocent of that harm. He should not pay for what another has done. P.S., if you dare take the case to trial, the court will make it quite clear that you will face the max if convicted, and the bench will do all in its power to secure the conviction. When the judge is biased, it is difficult to win even a jury trial despite innocence. Nice thought though. If you want to drink and drive, become a cop.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wish that all of these people who want to be protected and kept safe from all potential harm by government would go live in one place so I could go live somewhere else.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Juries 'think' they are 'limited' by the instruction given to them by the judge. In my case (one glass of wine during dinner), when my attorney was questioning the trooper - "Was he unsteady on his feet?" ("No."), "Was he slurring his words?" ("No") - the judge jumped in and instructed the jury, even prior to the conclusion of testimony, with "We're not saying he was 'drunk' and driving. The charge is 'driving under the influence' (DUI)". So, under these instructions I was guilty were I to have used Vicks Formula 44 as a cough suppressant and I was convicted - the game is rigged.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Parameters of the blood of a victim of a scam DUI are completely meaningless. If safety is the goal, and it is accepted that states should deal with highways.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Maybe it was that Crack she smoked after the wine.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Today, "government" is a scam, not just the games they play on us to steal our money.

    ReplyDelete
  13. i got a dui back in 1989, i only had drank couple beer in 3 hours. i get me a lawyer an i plan on having a jury trial. i knew i wasnt drunk. we went to court 3 times, the judge would put if off for some reason. My lawyer talked me into pleadin a no low, that i couldnt win with MADD and all. he said i would only have to pay a fine and that would be all. i went to court, the judge wouldnt take my no low, took my license for6 months, put me on probation for a year. i had to pay 30 dollars a month probation fee. I found out couple years later my lawyer got busted for cocaine and never went to trial. so i had a crooked lawyer. now if i even drink a single beer, i stay at home.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I have an idea - KILL everyone! Yes, that guarantees that no harm could possibly come to anyone.
    Oh - we're doing that. OK.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Have you had a loved one killed by a drunk driver that had no business driving? Until you answer yes to that...you really need to s.t.f.u.!"

    Well, yes I have. And you are the one who needs to s.t.f.u. Anyone with half a brain can see that DUI has become an industry onto itself in this country. Countless thousands of innocent people have had their lives turned upside down for nothing. The DUI laws in this country are for two things; 1) extracting as much money as possible from the populace and 2) Control.

    You really need to educate yourself on this scam before posting such shallow and thoughtless comments.

    ReplyDelete