Sunday, April 24, 2011

Hate Crime At McDonalds in Baltimore?Dude Looks like a Lady

                 I wonder if this incident at a McDonalds in Baltimore will be used to pass further hate crime laws protecting transgender class of people. Not just assaulting will be targeted.We might see laws just saying something that might offend or hurt someones feelings who is a transvestite can be criminalized. I can see many groups using this incident to advance attacks on people's freedom of speech where people in public places will be walking on eggshells watching every word they speak.People will be having to watch with eyes in the back of their heads making sure the thought police will not be eavesdropping on a private conversation.The act of just saying something negative about homosexuals and transvestites can be considered a hate crime because of the speech, With this video of an assault in this fast food restaurant will be used by Homosexual and Transgender rights groups to push for more Hate Crime Legislation. This video we can see many of these groups will use for public sympathy.They will use emotion and not rational thinking to get public support to advance their cause so the true hidden agenda is not exposed.
                 In Great Britain and Canada. They already have the Hate Speech police going undercover into cafe's,bars and restaurants to monitor people's speech to make sure no speaks critical of homosexuals and other protected minorities.They go into churches to see if the minister does not speak ill of a protected class of people. Many Pastors have went to jail speaking out for their belief about homosexuality.
                 Here is were the real kicker will be. The two girls who assaulted this person in McDonalds are Black. Another protected minority. I wonder how they will be able to charge these two ladies with hate crimes. If it would be two white ladies attacking this trans gender. HATE crime,Two white guys attacking a black transvestite,HATE crime.We might see a double standard in this case on hate crime.There could be a possible conflict. How about just charging them with felony assault? Why do we need hate crimes? It does not make any sense. I definitely know if it were two white girls or Caucasian males attacking a black transvestite in a McDonalds in that video. It would be all over the news more than what this story is getting now. It be Mathew Sheppard and James Byrd story combined on steroids  Eric Holder of the Obama Justice Department would take over the case to score some good publicity attacking white America. This is a story they might want to go away quietly because both parties are considered a protected class of people. The issue hate crimes laws would bring the critics out of the woodwork calling out the hypocrisy if these two girls do not get charged with a hate crime. A double standard would be exposed.
                My take on this is. Live and let live .If her boyfriend hit on this person while she/he or shim was eating minding their own business .The girlfriend should have left him there to deal with it after he found out who the patrol was. Attacking this person was very ill advised and wrong for something the boyfriend did was stupid. I do not go out with my lady going hitting on other girls when she is with me. These ladies should have kicked the boyfriend in the jewels.Not the customer eating in the restaurant. For the person is decides they want to dress like a lady. They made a choice.Even though it may not seem right how people will treat them. They have to live with their choice and count the cost. Christians ,Patriots and 911 truthers live with the ridicule.They made their choice too and understand the price they pay choosing to stay the course. Just because a person decides to be gay or a cross dresser.It does not make them special either.If they do it for one group of people.They have to do it for everybody.No protected classes of people. They have to count the cost too.If they are not willing to accept the consequences that people will not always treat you with open arms and accept them.That is their problem. All the draconian hate crime laws will not stop this incident in Mcdonalds not matter what.



  1. What you people are really afraid of is losing the right to hate.

  2. Americans are Americans, godless, angry, violent and very very stupid.

  3. yes, I am afraid of losing the right to hate, or having any other of my human emotions subject to laws written by zionist control freaks.

    I have a right to hate, and there are a lot of things worthy of my hatred. I hate tyrants, and I hate people who think they have a right to tell me how to think.

    If you can tell me who and what to hate shouldn't you also be telling me who and what to love?

    Why don't you mind your own GD business and let me hate whomever I want to, without you trying to dictate my emotions to me??

    Another control freak who wants to "rid the world of hate" and everything else you consider bad by dictating my life and thoughts. I hate YOU, you control freak bitch, and I hope your head rolls down the street.

  4. To hate is human. It is in our instincts. If it is repressed, it someday boils over.

  5. You have to seriously ask yourself one question: Was this event staged? Did someone arrange to have all the elements of the propaganda machine present and operating 100%?

    I will bet it was a show for an agenda.

  6. A really, REALLY good point, Masher1.

  7. Good luck with your right to hate. You people are sick!!!

  8. All you trying to call this hate and protect this perversion are nothing more than controlled Zionist puppets. This kind of thing happens hundreds of times a day to white America by blacks and no one cares until it has a twist of perversion to it.
    Want to know what is sick? The fact that you people don't see the racism and hatred of the blacks first but are more worried about the sissy guy playing girl . You didn't see the fact that the hate came from the blacks because first the victim was white. you didn't care until you found out the victim was an effeminate male playing a sick perverse role as a female. This is not normal but you have been trained by a government full of sick demonic filled people to believe this is normal. Your minds are now controlled and you are now a puppet.
    This happens every day to whites by blacks but the Jewish controlled media won't report it because then you will wake up from your stupor and realize that you have really been taught to hate. You might realize that the agenda is to annihilate the white race, then all the others who are not in line with the Jewish agenda. This is all about protecting and promoting a protected race of people or a perverse nature of Zionism .
    In the media you always see alleged white crimes, dead white women to get you used to it but you never see the crimes whereas white people are dead by non white4s which are 10 times worst or in the numbers. Hell , every race has laws to protect their criminal behavior toward whites in order to make the whites always the perpetrator. Are you so blind you can not see? This is a sad event but is only reported because the victim was involved in a perverse protected lifestyle not because he was white.

    They even have you fools trained to call him a woman! How sick is that? He's a man and if he was not to mentally sick in the head about playing women he could have defended himself, instead he laid down like an effeminate little sissy and took the beating simply to give the illusion he was a female.A dog has more laws protecting it than a white does and this is by design by the sick people of our government( Zionist) so as to make the whites always look like the perpetrator and break the so called law unless that white is involved in a protected perverse nature such as this homosexual who got what he deserved. Time to wake up people before they kill us all with their perverse laws against being white.

    While this beat down was sick and is really a hate crime because the victim was white , the only reason it is getting so much coverage is because the victim practices a Judaic government protect perverse ritual of homosexuality.

    The original story was that the homosexual used the girls bathroom then was changed to he made attempts to flirt with the girls boyfriend. I believe the first report because if this was a normal male using the girls bathroom you all would have a problem with that and he would have been a sick perverse man showing his penis to females and gawking at the females in the bathroom. If it had been reported like that then all of you would be mad at him because he appeared to be perverse, sexual predator, ect, ect. But since he was a protected class you call anyone who disagrees hateful. But since he was not a normal male doing a perverse act he is protected because he is a protected perverse non-normal male he is protected. See how perverse they have you minds?

    Lets faces the facts! The girls by nature are racist, plain and simple. If it had been a black homosexual they would have laughed it off and teased him but because he was white they beat him . We all know this to be fact butt are afraid to speak this truth because it is not politically correct to do so or we will be labeled racist OMG!!! Second the girls was a dude practicing a perverse nature which you have been trained to accept as normal because he dresses like a girl but if that same man did the same thing because he was normal in mind then he would be the perpetrator.

  9. Rick, I wanna kick you in the teeth, along with half of the other people who commented this. How in the hell can you think its ok for these stupid girls to brutally beat someone who isnt even fighting back until they have a seizure while everyone else watches and laughs just because they're a dude who dresses like a girl? That is not ok, not to mention all of you who wanna preach about free speech i think part of free speech should be the right to dress however you want within the realm of decency, as in dont let your junk hang out in public but if youre a man who feels like wearing a dress and makeup go for it. You people are despicable, just because you're a homophobic bigot who belongs in 1953 doesnt make what happened to this poor girl acceptable. And yes I said girl, because if she considers herself female then to me she is. It is disgusting and it is wrong for anybody to just stand by and watch someone get brutally beaten and do nothing to help them, regardless of their sexuality or gender. How anybody could possibly think thats ok is beyond my realm of comprehension. Anybody who thinks such an act should be permissable disgusts me because that means you are a terrible person with absolutely no morals whatsoever. As if being a cross dresser makes you less of a human being, you sicken me. Oh and just an fyi, im a female and im not gay.

  10. I'm not sure how protecting human beings from being brutally attacked for being out in public is the same as infringing on the freeom of speech. Those people weren't just telling that person off they beat the snot of of him. They could have killed him, and IF "Rick" is right, and it's a mental illness to be gay (which I don't believe is true, by the way) is attacking people really the best way to treat the "disease"? I think not. That video reminded me of stories about Emmitt Till, and the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. There is always someone to hate. I wish we could all rise above this pettiness.

  11. Anon0mous Coward, I wouldn't even let a girl attempt to kick me in my teeth . However you have shown your hypocrisy. It's ok for you to express anger and even threaten violence and kick someone in the teeth while you condemn the same violence you claim in your rebuttal to me is proper. You sicken me with your perverse twisted mind , You would be the first bigot to beat the crap out of someone because they claim they don't like gays . You stated so yourself!What you are claiming is that it is ok for the effeminate male dressed as a woman to think anyway he wants but its wrong for me to have that same right. Get over it! there is nothing wrong with being "homophobic" while homos have a phobia against straights. Its abnormal to be homosexual and is a sexual sickness.Just because you have been trained to call us that does not mean spit.

    Apparently you have a problem comprehending what you read as I did state that the beat down was was sick. And only a mentally deficient person would allow someone to train them that this sick perverted man dressed as a woman is actually a woman. Have you not one bone of truth in you or are your morals as perverted as your twisted mind?If a man molested a five year old boy you would have a fit about it and want him executed but if a man labeled a homosexual does the same your sick mind is trained to have sympathy for him. See how they have you trained to accept that which is abnormal as normal? And you have the nerve to mention "morals".

    You said "HE" was a girl and at the same time you told me you was a girl. If your mind is that screwed up and perverted , how can anyone trust you are a girl or what you say you are? See how demented you sound?

    Oh and I never preached about free speech until now . Free speech has nothing to do with ones desire to act perverse because there is no speech in it. Free speech is what I am doing now. Saying what i believe is true without the minions of satan and perverse nature forcing me to believe as them or else.

    So, the original story is that the pervert dressed as a woman used the woman's bathroom and exposed himself in front of these black girls , then the confrontation began. This man dressed as a woman could have defended himself but thought it better to act effeminate to prove in his own mind that he is a woman . How sick is that. Now the story changed overnight to fit the homosexual agenda and to warp the minds of people like you who have no defense against mind control and therefor are easily trained to be part and partaker in this perversion.Second he was out dressed like that to look for men......, another perversion, or perhaps little boys to molest , but that's ok with your sick mind ....right?

    So to some it all up , your angry because I don't believe like you. Therefore you threaten violence because I don't think in a perverse nature like you. The same violence you are complaining about which happened to the man dressed as a woman, yes I said man because the truth is greater than your lies.So what you are saying is its ok for you to get violent and express anger toward someone who does not think in a perverse nature like you so therefore that person is "despicable" and has no morals because he does not think in the same perverse anti-moral mind as you. So who is despicable here?
    Homosexuality is perverse and anyone calling a man a woman is a liar and as perverse as the man they protect. Get off the Politically correct BS and call those things what they really are. That is called truth and if you can't tell the truth for fear of being labeled then you are part of the problem and the lies you tell to protect perversion show how immoral you really are. Hypocrisy is the biggest issue for you! Even Jesus hated the Hypocrites because their minds were as perverse as yours. And please don't demand I lie to protect your fantasies or perversions! The truth needs no laws to protect it.

  12. @Rick - ...and Jesus went around telling people to judge and be violent against others. In which passage in the Bible did your savior call out homosexuals. On the other hand, I distinctly remember the passage which says something like, "let he who is without sin cast the first stone," in defense of a prostitute. A prostitute he most likely fucked many a times in the time to come.

  13. As far as lying calling a man a woman...what happens when a man loses his testicles in a car accident. If by your definition a man is a man because of his sexual parts, then is he no longer a man? He's not producing testosterone at the same levels anymore either.

  14. Boy Luke you are really screwed in the head . A man losing his testicles is still a man but if he decides to suck dick then he is a sick homosexual and a pervert. While you want to quote the bible , remember that Jesus said that a man should not lie with a man and if he is found to do so then the people were to stone him and his perverse partner to death.

    And concerning " he who is without sin cast the first stone" Jesus who was God in the flesh was talking to the Hypocrites who were the Jews at the time.

    Oh and yes Jesus did go around and tell people to judge. The bible says " you will know them by the fruits the bare." How can you know unless you judge? I could go on for thousands of scriptures about how God does want us to judge and to destroy things that are perverse. After all I am an ordained Pastor and very articulate in biblical history and scripture.

    And since you didn't notice, God ( Jesus) was showing the difference between a prostitute and a perverse sexual man which warrants death according to the Bible.A prostitute is not worthy of death but a homo is. You see that is why God put women on the earth, but not for prostitution, however it is not a greater sin than the homo is.

    Hell , if you were as smart as you pretend to be you would know that after the age of about 4o men only produce about 50% of the testosterone that he used to, Does that mean that they are not men anymore?

    You sir are a looser who cannot even come up with an honest rebuttal , just simple BS to sooth your own perverse mind and to coddle that which you have been programed to do.

    BTW , you would know which passage Jesus called out the homosexual if you read it instead of insinuating that it is not in the bible. But its there! And I'll tell you one more thing . They will all go to hell, that's in the Bible also!

    Geeeez, the dumbing down of America is really working like the Zionist palnned.For some that is!

  15. Which passage does Jesus speak out against the homosexuals in? I know homosexuality is put down in for example in Genesis and Leviticus, but both of these are books of the old testament? The same books which were revered by the Jews which you seem to be very much against. The same books which the New Testament contradicts all over the place (i.e. Eye-for-an-eye vs. forgiving your neighbor 7 times 77).

    So the Jews cannot be hypocrites but Christians can be? Isn't that sort of a double standard? And who are you to judge whether being a homosexual is a greater sin then prostitution? According to your beliefs isn't God the only one who reserves that right?

    As for reduced rate of testosterone production, I think you misunderstand my point. I didn't say a man who lost his testicles is no longer a man. I was trying to understand what your criteria for being a man is. If it's not sexual organs then what? Obviously not mannerisms, or the mind?

  16. As far as programming goes...which one of us spewing hatred based on a book (which they are not even reading correctly) written centuries ago? Which on of us is judging people based on standards forced into their heads over generations?

    I also resent you saying my comments were dishonest. I stated no facts, but rather posed questions. You sir, are the one using fairy tales to make a point.

  17. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. Below are some Bible verses that condemn homosexuality:

    * Leviticus 18:22 - You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.
    * Leviticus 20:13 - If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.
    * Romans 1:26-27 - For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
    * I Corinthians 6:9(NIV) - Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
    * I Timothy 1:8-11 (NASB) - "But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted."
    * Jude 1:6-7 (NASB) - And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day, just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.

  18. BTW Luke , the New Testament is nothing more than refinement of the old if you know how to understand the Bible.

    The Jews do not revere the old Testament , they use it to their advantage . They have the "Talmud " which is the Jews only bible and reads like a book of Pedophilia . I bet you even think the Jews are Gods chosen people? I'll bet you think they are Israel of the Bible? Read the book of Jon and see how much God hated the Jews is still does today.

    Oh, and to show you the real perversion, lets take the word " Neighbor" which you mentioned above. Thousands of years ago it meant " Race" or those of your tribe, so the word of the Bible actually meant " Love your race as you would yourself." It was the Jews who perverted the word neighbor through there complete control of all media and their wanton desire to pervert truth.

    They even perverted the word Saccson meaning "from the tribe of ISAAC to the word "Saxon" so the real tribe or chosen would not know whom they are.Isaac was given the promise by God not the Jews. I bet you believe the fabled state of Israel is the same Israel of the bible? Not so, another Judaic myth.

    Hey and if you want to read "fairy tales" read what the Bible says would come from the mouth of the Jew continually.......fairy tales in Titus .

    And I'll bet you believe the Jewish fable of Eve eating an apple, or that all of the earths population came from Eve. That is not so and the bible proves it a Judaic myth or fable as the Bible puts it. You believe these myths because you have been programed to believe them. You've heard others repeat them over the years and you just take them as fact instead of {studying to show yourself the approved word of God") and studying history for facts.The Bible never contradicts itself and is very clear, your simply must have the desire to know truth and the mind to be able to discern it also.

    The bible is not a squishy book about love for all the worlds peoples and not all the worlds people are called mankind in the Bible. Its is a book for one tribe only just as the Muslims have theirs, the Jews have their Talmud and so on. It is never a book about the Jews but is totally against them in every aspect. Even the verse above states that homosexuals are to be "put to death." That is the word of God and it never changes.The bible is about the Saacsons who are the only people called " man " by God. Anyone else ( race) does not fit not the " mankind" scheme of Gods words. Yes it is a very racist book , but after all He is God. No more racist than the Jews Talmud or the Muslim's book , ect ect.

  19. BTW Luke, the New testament is never reverenced by the Jews, it is used by the Jews to convince mankind that they are the chosen ones so they can get away with their many crimes and to convince gullible Christians to believe they are the chosen which the bible states clearly they are not! The bible clearly states that the Jews are the anti-Christ and the enemies of GOD.

    Many fools believe the "anti-Christ " is going to be some future beast or man but the bible clearly states that the word "anti-Christ " means many or a race of people. Jesus said in His days their were many anti-Christ and in your days there will be many also. So how could the anti-Christ be singular? It isn't, in JOHN Jesus shows that the anti-Christ were the Jews who were first known as the Pharisees and the Scribes.

    Considering "fairy Tales" The bible says in Titus that were are never to believe a word that comes from the mouth of a Jew because they continually tell fables. lie and pervert the word of God.

    Many, many verses in the Bible show that Jesus denied being Jew, and denied He is the source of the Jews nor they are the source of Him. Jesus being God explains in this scripture that He is not of the Jews nor did He create them or them He. Jesus denies to Pilot three times that He is King of the Jews in a verse know as Pilots Affirmation.

    So Yes the Bible preaches hatred and Love but only unto the Saccsons for it is written just for them. The Bible shows its hatred for the Jews and even proves that no other race of people were present when the Jews murdered Jesus. Jesus states Himself that " if my servants were here would they not fight that I not be delivered ( for crucifixion) unto the Jews? " In this statement alone Jesus never mentions the Romans as His murderers , only the Jews. The Roman thing was placed in the Bible by the Jews.

  20. Dude, all your "I bet yous" are completely off. I was referencing to the fact that the Bible is nothing more than a fiary-tale. No different than Greek or Celtic myths, except in that it has caused more death, destruction, and suffering than any of those.

  21. And I don't get the fundamentalist hatred of the Jews. Even if it was the Jews as a whole that wanted Jesus killed, then isn't Christianity based around the death and resurrection of the "savior". If there was nobody there to kill him, he would not have been able to die for your sins.

    Where did you get the BS about "neighbor" meaning "race"?

    Am, I conversing with a white supremacist? If so, this discussion is over! I knew you were ignorant from the start, but it really is hard for me to accept the fact that individuals like you still exist in today's society.

  22. Here's one thing I'm very confused about. The story of the good Samaritan. Was this not told by Jesus to show that we are all neighbors. The Samaritan's were not Christians, and the beaen Jew was not a Christian either.

    Or is there a way you can twist and pervert this story to show how Jesus wanted us to hate everyone except for those that are of the same "race"?

  23. Luke said...

    Dude, all your "I bet yous" are completely off. I was referencing to the fact that the Bible is nothing more than a fiary-tale. No different than Greek or Celtic myths, except in that it has caused more death, destruction, and suffering than any of those.

    It's supposed to be that way Luke unless you are simply listening to someone preach their version instead of reading the Bible truth of the real chosen race.

  24. Here is a site for you to read of the perfect hatred for Jews

    In John 8 we see the contempt and hatred God had for the Jews calling them the real anti-Christ. Jesus told them that they are of their Father the Devil and much more , worse thanI care to explain here. Read it for yourself. Jesus also states in Titus 1:13 God tells us to rebuke the Jews daily and sharply and that we are to never listen to any word that comes from the mouth of a Jew.That they tells fables all the time and pervert the word of God.

    In John 8 The Pharisees ( Jews of Jesus time) told Jesus that Abraham was their Father. But Jesus rebuked them and said " IF Abraham WAS YOUR FATHER you would do as Abraham does . But now you ( Jews) seek to kill me. The next verse Jesus denies to the Jewish Pharisees that God is their Father.John 8:26 Jesus says to the Jews "I have many things to say and judge of you" thusly condemning and rebuking them again.

    In John 18:36 "Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

    Above we see Jesus exclaim once and for all who murdered him. There is no mention of Roman soldiers as the Jewish interpreters put into our Bibles. There is no one mentioned except the Jews whom crucified Jesus. WE are not all responsible for the murder of Jesus , only the Jews are. Jesus even said that if His servants ( Christians) were present that they Christians would "FIGHT" and kill every last one of the Jews to keep them from crucifying our Lord.

    Lastly in this verse is the real clincher of who Jesus was and is not. Jesus tells the Jews " but now is my kingdom not from hence." If you look the word "Hence " up you will find that Jesus has made His final rebuke and revealing truth about the Jews/ But the Jewish controlled Churches and the Jewish controlled media has kept you ignorant so you will not find the truth.

    Looking up the word "Hence " we find that the meaning is ": from this source or origin ." So we see that Jesus is telling these Jews that He IS NOT from the source or origin of the Jews and neither are they from Him. The Bible tells us that we must " study to show ourselves approved." What does this mean? It means we must study History and Biblical truth from the original transcripts or autographs of the word of God in order to show that what we are reading is the approved word of GOD. This is what I have just done in these several paragraphs. Notice that Jesus says "MY KINGDOM IS NOT FROM HENCE" meaning not from the Jew, and nor are they from Him!

    Read more: In the bible, it says jews are gods chosen ones... so... doesn't it make sense for christians to become jewish? just wondering... | Answerbag

  25. Lastly we know that God left the word Israel as a curse unto them who stole Israel's heritage. The tiny state of Israel in the middle East is a stolen word from Gods chosen applied to the most terrorist nation in the world. God left that name unto those who stole Israel's heritage. The state of Israel was created in 1948 by the Khazar Jews who murdered whole towns of Palestinian Christians in order to steal their land and they still murder them today growing very near to a complete genocide of the Palestinian peoples. The land named Israel in 1948 has absolutely no biblical significance at all. It has nothing to do with the Bible, God or the chosen peoples whom the Jews can never be according to Gods word. The state of Israel has no blessings of God upon it for it is the worlds foremost terrorist nation upon the earth. It was obtained by murder and bloodshed, lying, thieving , by a complete racist people.
    The Bible always refers to "Israel" as a people whom are the chosen, not a piece of land . And the Bible never says Jews are the Chosen. But it does explain who the Chosen are and it gives many clues as to whom they are but never unto the Jews who are the enemy of Christ. The chosen quite clearly according to the Bible are the Caucasians who are true Israel given that new name because the Jews stole their heritage. Its in your Bible, study with understanding and listen to God for the truth.

    Read more: In the bible, it says jews are gods chosen ones... so... doesn't it make sense for christians to become jewish? just wondering... | Answerbag

  26. Now to your alleged rebuttal on the word neighbor, The bible says to "divide " the word of God to get its meaning. This is what I will do here.

    Mat 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.

    You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of
    your own people, but shall love your neighbor as yourself… (Leviticus

    Here we see the bible tells us that we should not take "vengeance or bear a grudge against the "sons of your own people" BUT "love thy neighbor ( sons of your own people , ie Race) as you love yourself. We see that the bible sees Race and neighbor as the same because the sons of your own people ( race) are in fact you neighbors. If you can;tr see this truth that God bestows upon us then I feel sorry for you!

    The verse made it clear that neighbors were “the sons of your own
    people” — in other words, neighbor meant a fellow Israelite ( race white) and not
    other peoples. The most recent Jewish translation of the verse uses
    “your countrymen” in place of “the sons of your own people.” which is a bible perversion.

    The Jewish Encyclopedia
    says it clearly, “Here the Gentile is excepted, as he is not a neighbor…” if the Jews know this how come you don't?

    Therefore, the part about “Thou shalt not
    kill” becomes part of a larger context. It could read:159
    Thou shalt not kill, neither shalt though commit adultery, neither
    shalt thou steal, neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy
    neighbor, neither shalt thou covet your neighbor’s wife and you
    shall not desire your neighbor’s house, his field, or his manservant,
    or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your
    So who are the Israelites ( white Anglo Saccsons) proscribed from killing? “Thou shalt not
    kill thy neighbor… the children of thy people, the sons of your own
    people, your fellow Israelites.” ...

    "They speak of you with evil intent; your adversaries misuse your name. Do I not hate those who hate you, O LORD, and abhor those who rise up against you? I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies", Psalms 139:21

  27. As far as calling me a "white supremacist " you are wrong and have shown that your mind has been altered to follow the commandments of your rulers and leaders who wish you not know the truth. In that aspect you are a well trained "goyim" for the masters who told you and trained that when you can not debate with intelligence , shout them down and call them names such as anti-Semite and white supremacist.

    I never said I was white, but I don't have to be white to tell the truth. I just simply need to have the desire for the truth.The problem here is that you are morally bankrupt and have no intellect to debate with truth so it easier for you to say " if your a white supremacist then this conversation is over" because this is your way of running out of a loosing battle for which you can't possibly win due to moral bankruptcy and desire to know the truth for it is more important for you to appease than to know the truth.

    But, FYI I am racially aware if that's what you want to know.And that makes me leaps and bounds ahead of you in the moral category.

  28. Now , let me get to another Biblical revelation that will really piss you off. Remember , I didn't say this but God did, and I agree with him.

    Genesis 1:25: "And God made the Beast of the Earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."

    In Genesis 1:27-31, it says God created male and female, tells them to be fruitful, multiply and have dominion over every living thing, and God beheld everything that He had made and it was good. Everything that God made has its seed within itself, therefore it is good because it produces only its own kind. Like begets like. Never do the simpler forms of life violate this law unless forced to by the higher form, man.

    When different races mix, they do not bring forth their own kind; their offspring are mongrels or hybrids. This is a transgression against Divine Law, upsetting Nature's delicate balance and producing that which is not good. Little wonder that, so often in the past, God has destroyed His own children for mongrelizing, and, you can be sure, He will again.

    Deuteronomy 7:6: "For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth." The Adamic Race is to have dominion over every form of life previously created. This includes not only the four legged beasts, but the two legged as well. The Negro is an articulate member of this Beast Creation. For proof that they are beasts, and God calls them exactly that.
    Exodus 23:10-11: "And six years thou shalt sow thy land, and shalt gather in the fruits thereof: But the seventh year thou shalt let it rest and lie still; that the poor of thy people may eat: and what they leave the beasts of the field shall eat. In like manner thou shalt deal with thy vineyard, and with thy oliveyard."

    If wild or even domesticated animals were beasts of the field, just picture what would happen to your gardens and vineyards. Note the distinction God makes here between the "poor of thy people" and the "beasts of the field" the poor of thy people shall eat first.

    Exodus 9:9: "And it shall become small dust in all the land of Egypt, and shall be a boil breaking forth with blains upon man, and upon beast, throughout all the land of Egypt."
    You can be sure God was not punishing four legged beasts by afflicting them with boils.

    Leviticus 20:15-16: "And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

    This certainly could not be a four legged beast that a man or woman could lie with. If it were, God would not demand the death penalty for a dumb animal with no reasoning power.

    Exodus 19:13: "There shall not an hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live: when the trumpet soundeth long, they shall come up to the mount."
    Now we have a beast with a hand. Do you believe God told Moses to talk to the camels, donkeys, cattle and tell them not to touch the mount?

    Jeremiah 7:20: "Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, mine anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place, upon man, and upon beast..."
    Jeremiah 21:6: "And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and beast: they shall die of a great pestilence."
    Would God refer to a four legged beast as an inhabitant of a city?

    Jeremiah 27:6: "And now have I given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant; and the beasts of the field have I given him also to serve him."
    The Negro race has always been used as servants.

  29. PART 2: Jeremiah 31:27-30: "...the seed of man, and with the seed of beast...But every one shall die for his own iniquity."
    How can an animal die for his sins and iniquity? They cannot because they do not know God’s Laws so they cannot sin.

    Jeremiah 31:34: "And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more."
    It would appear this verse pretty well takes care of the liberal's so-called Brotherhood Program.

    Ezekiel 14:15: "If I cause noisome beasts to pass through the land, and they spoil it, so that it be desolate, that no man may pass through because of the beasts."
    Only two legged beasts could stop man from passing through the land.

    Ezekiel 29:11: "No foot of man shall pass through it, nor foot of beast shall pass through it, neither shall it be inhabited forty years."
    Now the beast inhabitant not only has a hand but a foot as well. Animals have hoofs or paws.

    Jonah 3:7-8: "Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water: But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands."
    What manner of beast would wear sackcloth; have the power of speech and, once again, we see that the beast has hands?

    Zechariah 8:10: "For before these days there was no hire for man, nor any hire for beast..."
    Here we have beasts that can be hired.
    The great boast of modern civilization is its unparalleled degree of enlightenment when compared with preceding ages. While marvelous advances have been made in the realm of many sciences, in other respects we are still groping about in a clouded maze of misconceptions. Colleges and universities have been taken over by aliens and are teaching as truth philosophies which have no substance in actual fact.

    For example, because the doctrines of the atheistic school of natural development are accepted as the acme of scholarship, specifically the theory of the evolution of the species, the door to understanding has been fastened shut in regard to the true origin of the races.

    The Bible stands as an impregnable bulwark against today's modern slogan that all men, regardless of color, are blood brothers. The patriarchs of the Bible, the prophets of old, the apostles of the early Christian Church, do not support this view. Nevertheless, under the operation of the Law of the Lord, all are entitled to equality of justice and righteousness in judgment.

    The simple truth regarding the origin of the races demonstrates conclusively that the Negroes and the White Race do not have a common ancestry.

    A full grasp of this fact will go a long way toward solving racial problems which are menacing the entire world today. When the undeniable truth is known and acted upon, it will bring about an abrupt and complete cessation of the present attempt to elevate the colored races or Jews to positions of authority over those whom the Lord instructed: "Thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother."

    So we respectfully ask that you bring to this study an open mind in search of truth. And we feel that if you do you will find that a careful weighing of the evidence presented herein will result in an astounding comprehension of aspects of the story the Bible tells which has long been hidden from view.

    Much more to this study here:

  30. Another site to the above mentioned:

  31. More Bible truth by dividing the word of God.

    The word beast appears throughout scriptures and often appears as simple "Beast", or "Beast of the Field", or "Beast of the Earth". Three different Hebrew words are translated into the English word BEAST in the Bible. The Hebrew word CHAYAH means LIVING CREATURE, the word BEHEMA, meaning quadrupeds (like cattle), and BEIR , meaning BRUTE BEAST. The Greek word ZOON translated BEAST means LIVING CREATURE.

    In tracing this word down through scriptures, it is important to note that the Bible speaks of both quadruped (four-footed) beast and biped (two-legged) beasts. If you have failed to distinguish between beasts (quadruped) and beasts (biped) in the Holy Bible, you have missed a great deal of the truth. We are concerned with the Hebrew word CHAYAH, which means LIVING CREATURE, and which we feel refers to the following biped (two-legged) beasts.

    As you study the following scriptures and provide an answer to each question, perhaps the full implications of the Bible biped beast will become more clear to you.

    It is interesting to note that in all of these scriptures we find reference to a BEAST that is apparently biped (two-legged) and who can talk, riot, commit adultery, co-habit with man, work in vineyards, use his hands, wear clothing, cry unto his creator and sow his seed with other races. Those who have clearly traced this Hebrew word CHAYAH through the scriptures under the English word beast, know it is speaking of the NEGRO! If this truth were known and taught from the pulpits of our American churches, it would stop the mad race toward racial suicide and mongrelaziation of the races dead in its tracks.

    Was Joel speaking of a "beast" or field hand in Joel 2:22

    What kind of a beast do you know that wears clothing (sack-cloth) as we read in Jonah 3:8?

    What kind of a beast has hands as reported in Exodus 19:13?

    What type of beast is capable of mixing or "sowing" his seed with the "seed of Adam" as described in Jeremiah 31:27?

    What kind of a male beast could a woman lust after and "lie down thereto" and cause God to have them executed in righteous judgment? Leviticus 20:16

    What kind of a female beast could a man lust after and cause a penalty of death to be decreed by God? Leviticus 20:15

    What kind of beast would have the ability to "keep the vineyard" as we find in The Song of Solomon, Chapter 1, who incidentally was Black?

    What kind of beast "cries mightily unto God" in Jonah 3 8-10?

    What kind of a beast would have "eyes full of adultery," as recorded in 2 Peter 2:12-14?

    What kind of beast loves to riot in the daytime? 2 Peter 2:12

    What kind of a beast can talk or speak? 2 Peter 2:12

    What kind of a beast was made to be taken and DESTROYED? 2 Peter 2:12

    The Bible

  32. I think I'm beginning to see what you are saying. Us poor white folks, we're victims here of the woes inflicted on us by Jews and Negroes. Our ranks are even infiltrated by half-breed abominations.

    I guess if you put enough time and energy into it you could even make the story of the tortoise and the hare out to be a tale of how the Jews and Negroes are ruining the white people's lives.

    I need to make one thing clear. I think all religion is BS and that god does not exist but is rather a tool of the powerful to further oppress the weak. I think part of the reason why I dislike the Christian religion more than any other is because too often I come across individuals like you.

  33. Your only basis for all your "facts" is a book. Maybe I'll start quoting "the Hobbit" from now on to prove my points.

  34. Just out of curiosity, are you a member of the KKK?

  35. And since we're on the topic of Leviticus...

    Leviticus 19:33-34 - "When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God."

  36. You about summed it up right Luke. But you forgot one thing, in the Bible in the end we win!

    In case you have no real mental capabilities to understand , what I was trying to imply here is that you are being controlled. Furthermore the Bible stands as truth and no man has ever been able to disprove it. However, not one prophecy in the bible was ever fulfilled by a Jew or a black man.

    If you want to quote The Hobbit " as your truth then do so. I however will not because it is another Jewish fable written by a Jew and put out by the Jewish controlled media. Hey, when the SHTF and it will real soon, I hope you don't come running to us racially aware soldiers of God to protect you after you spit in our face. I do however feel that one day you will eat your own words and suffer from your own ignorance.

    But since you want to quote hobbit then why don;t you tell us how great of a hero Martin Luther King was, even though they sealed his criminal records until 2020 so we can not find the truth. But the truth got out anyway and we find he is inept, morally bankrupt, a thief and a plagiarist and much more. Or you can tell us about the inept moron Albert Einstein who also was a plagiarist , and inept moron who couldn't even tie his own shoes but was held up by the Jewish controlled media as a hero even though they know he stole all his alleged ideals from great white inventors.
    Or perhaps you could tell us how 19 Arabs took control of a plane and crashed it into the twin towers but yet their is evidence of thermite in the dust which is used only in demolitions. Oh and BTW the firefighters are dying of thermite poisoning and so are the people. But yet it was a plane that took down the building with such force that the third building fell without being hit.

    Or tell me about how they dug Osama up and killed him again. You believe in such fairy tales , I want you to tell me how it is you believe. You believe in assimilation but yet you honor your governments hatred toward Arabs and Palestinians all because Israel (JEWISH) demands it.Many hypocrites will hate if their government authorizes it and you seem to be that type if person.

    AS for you last statement on Leviticus, again I tell you that the Bible says to study to show yourself approved the word of GOD. In doing so you will find that the age old Septuagint does not frame the passage that way. In all this shows another perversion put in by Jewish scribes whom God warned us would "pervert the word of GOD". So in proving , one must know history and study the old books and learn the truth the Jews have not changed. For instance , the phrase "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do" is not in any testament of the Bible from 1600 back to the days of Jesus.

    This verse was added by the Jewish Rabbi's ( term used loosely) who murdered Jesus to make us believe they murdered one of their own and not one of ours and to make us believe that God had forgiven them , but He has NOT!

    So Luke , study to show yourself approved or forever be ignorant with your non existent assimilation and love of other races who hate you.

  37. Part II of the above:

    I noticed you used the "KKK" accusation like a good trained goy. One One does not have to belong to a group to know the truth but you have been trained to label people because you can not rebut the person or prove him wrong . How sad for you. BTW, the KKK is a Jewish organization and was started by a Jew in case you didn't know. But when they control the media they can accuse anyone they want of being whatever they want them to be, and they can alter history to but they can't hide the truth forever. I can;t believe that after all I told you about the Jew you would accuse me of being a member of their organization the "KKK". I bet you think the NAACP and the UNCF are black organization ? Nope they were started by the Jew and still run by the Jew to this day. Here's another one for you Luke before you make the mistake of calling someone a NAZI. Read the book "Hitlers Jewish Army." That's right Luke Nazis are Jews.

  38. I only ask about the KKK because the URL you provided me (which was a broken link by the way) had "KKK" in it.

    So essentially everyone is either a Jew or black. How can you be sure you are not a Jew or black yourself?

  39. you say "in the Bible in the end we win". I wasn't aware we were fighting a war. You tell me that I am being controlled, but let me ask you. Did you come to the conclusion that everyone is a Jew and all evil stems from the Jews and blacks by yourself?

  40. Jake the KKK is a christian organization just like the JDL which is Jewish and whom are responsible for tarnishing the KKK good name because they hate white people. However, the JDL is listed with the FBI as a terrorist organization but you don't hear about it because they also run the media.

    I never said everyone is a Jew or black and if you were listening or comprehending correctly you would have noticed that fact. At this point by you rebuttal, I think you are loosing it as you don't make any sense at all.

    Lastly, if you read the Bible we ( whites) are at war . There are more laws protecting every other race than there are protecting the whites. In fact there are no white specific laws at all. These laws are in place to keep the whites as perpetual victimizers . The truth is that the anti racist laws protect the greatest racist. The Bible clearly makes the notion that we are at war with the Jews and blacks.


    " Perhaps the most difficult assignment of a kinsman redeemer or as Numbers 35:19 puts it, a 'revenger of blood' or 'avenger' was to slay or execute the murderer of his relative. The avenger of blood as in Joshua 20:5 and elsewhere, is the same Hebrew word ga'al (#1350). This Law of God provided order and swift justice within the Israelite ( white) society. "

    The Law is exclusively applied to the White race. We know that Jesus never meant to nullify the Law (Mt. 5:17). Therefore, if an individual harms you or your kinfolk criminally, our Christian duty is to see that he is punished to the full extent of the law, in order to make sure he doesn't repeat the crime and inflict harm upon our neighbors ( race).

    See , the Bible is written for the white race only and never applies to anyone outside the white race.

    More in next writing

  41. Leviticus 19:18 NASB
    18 You shall not take vengeance,
    nor bear any grudge against the sons of your people,
    but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the LORD.

    Here we don't even need to look beyond the verse. That verse defines "neighbor" as the "sons of your people," or "your people." No wonder, then, that the Snakes in the pulpits of Judeo-Christian churches don't want you to know of that verse.

    Brother = Word 251
    . . . . in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
    Word 251 = Brother, literal or figurative

    The context of Leviticus 19 tells us we are speaking of your literal "Brother," or if figurative it is still confined to your race.

    2 (God says) ". . . Yet I have loved Jacob,
    3 but Esau I have hated, . . . " (Mal 1:2,3)

    Note Jacob is the white race and Esau is the Jewish race.

  42. Now let me get to the "The Sixth Law Of God". "Thou shalt not commit adultery."

    In earlier bibles from the 1611 KJ authorized version back to the Septuagint this same scripture has always read " Thou shalt not Adulterate. The Jewish scribes who interpreted the Bible for us inserted Thou shall not commit Adultery, in order to confuse Gods chosen into sin and to cause harm to Gods real chosen people by causing them to mix races which God forbade.The Bible explicitly claims that any and all race mixers and their children will NEVER enter heaven even unto the 19th generation. Which means it takes ten generations to wash this sin from the chosen people of the white race.

    In true copies of Gods word the above scripture would translate " "You will not mongrelize." or mix your seed with that of another race which is sin.
    The Greek word (akeraios), This word has been translated pure-blooded and nonmongrelized in the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament where it occurs in Philippians 2:14-15, which reads:

    "Do all things separate from murmurers and disputers, in order that you may be perfect in our kind: pure blooded and nonmongrelized, faultless children of God, amidst a race perverse and having been corrupted, among whom we appear like luminaries in the orderly arrangement."
    translation of Euripides' Phoenician Women, 942-943:

    "Now thou are our only survivor of the seed of that sown race, whose lineage is pure alike on mother's and on father's side, thou and these thy sons."

    Here Coleridge translates (akeraios) as lineage is pure. But translators and lexicographers cease to be honest when it comes to the Bible and other early Christian literature. For example, let us look at an accurate translation of Barnabas 3:6:

    "So then, brothers, the long-suffering One foresaw that the people whom He prepared in His Beloved should be persuaded in racial purity..."

    Read more here:

  43. Deuteronomy 23:2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

    A bastard is a cross breed not an illegitimate child.

    Bastard: In the Old Testament the rendering of the Hebrew word mamzer, which means "polluted." In (Deuteronomy 23:2) it occurs in the ordinary sense of illegitimate offspring. In (Zechariah 9:6) the word is used in the sense of foreigner. From the history of Jephthah we learn that there were bastard offspring among the Jews (Judges 11:1-7) In (Hebrews 12:8) the word (Gr. nothoi) is used in its ordinary sense, and denotes those who do not share the privileges of God's children.

    Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary -- mon'grel (mun'grel), n. A cross between types of persons or things. adj. Of or pertaining to an impure or mixed breed or race.

    Webster's New World Dictionary -- mon grel (mun'grel) adj. of mixed breed, race, origin, or character.

    Merriam Webster Dictionary --mon�grel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mnggrl, mng-) n. An animal or a plant resulting from various interbreedings, especially a dog of mixed or undetermined breed. A cross between different breeds, groups, or varieties, especially a mixture that is or appears to be incongruous. adj. Of mixed origin or character.

    Webster's 1821 Dictionary -- MONGREL, a. [See Mingle.] Of a mixed breed; of different kinds.

    Synonyms HYBRID, bastard, cross, crossbred, crossbreed, half blood, half-breed, mule


    They are, but they're hidden behind the Greek words "akathartos" and "akatharsia", which are usually mistranslated by KJV translators as "unclean spirit" and "uncleanness", rather than mamzer or mongrel, and mongrelization, and which are misrepresented by dictionaries and concordances like Strong's who have kept so many in the dark about the real meaning for so long.
    Claiming that God doesn't show partiality is a straw man argument, because the Holy Bible is the story about a VERY partial, judgmental, and dangerous God, one who made a "racist" everlasting covenant with only ONE race, (WHITE) the genetic descendants of Jacob. God has no obligation to treat mamzers favorably, even if mamzers don't have any control over the interracial marriages of their ancestors, and in fact God treats them with utter contempt, just as He should.

    his verse is saying the same thing that Malachi 4:1 said earlier:

    "For, behold, a day comes burning as an oven, and it shall consume them: and all those of another race, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that is coming shall set them on fire, says the Master Almighty, and there shall not be left of them root or branch."

    However, in the Greek Septuagint, the word nothos occurs in Wisdom 4:3, which reads in an accurate translation:

    "But the multiplying race of the ungodly will not be of great number nor gain power through mongrels propagating, nor will that race be allowed to advance nor accomplish a secure foundation."

  44. So NO Jake , I did not come to this conclusion by myself. I come to it from the great redeemer and the creator of mankind. BTW all other races do not fit into Gods scheme of mankind. When the bible speaks of mankind it speaks only of the white race for it was they whom God created in his image.

    No other race comes unto or can claim to be man according to biblical scriptures. When God created Adam and Eve and Eve did sin from having sex with the Devil, ie, thou enchanter have beguiled me. Beguiled means to sexually seduce . The story of the apple is a Jewish interpretation in our bible by the Jewish translators in order to confuse Gods real chosen people of the white race. The bible exclaims hundreds of time the heritage and whiteness of Gods chosen people Israel.

    Note that in the garden when Cain ( product of Satan) slew Able ( product of Adam) God threw Cain from the garden and he said " But father , if you throw me from the garden of Eden the others ( races before man) will seek me out to kill me. Proof that Eve was not the mother of all race because upon this perfect creation in Gods image there were others before them.This means all other races before the white man. God said I shall put a mark upon your head so that the OTHERS will not seek you out and kill you.

    See , God did not even call the "OTHERS" men but simply called them others. This means that the word "man " or Mankind " only refers to the white race which was created in Gods own image for which the Bible says was created for "Gods own purpose. So all of the races upon the earth do not fall into the Man scheme of Gods plan and there was only one race created that can be called man. This perfect creation should not ever "mongrelize" with the other races .

    To bless Israel means to bless the white man, and you shall also be blessed. Those who curse Israel ( the white man) shall also be cursed, that is bible truth.

    Yes , we are at war and because you don't know that does not make it untrue. Maybe it is because your mind is perverted with he devils word and hypocrisy, or maybe it is because of willful ignorance and your desire to appease, or satanic political correctness. Either way we still win .

  45. You keep calling me Jake, but my name is Luke?

    So the lord inspired you to hold these beliefs, you say. Was there ever a mentor figure (parents, pastor, friend), who helped you see the true meanings of the bible? That's all I'm curious about.

    As far as me not making sense, you say this, but you keep quoting a work of fiction, "the Bible", as the basis for your beliefs.

    Let me ask you another question. Do you believe that Zeus impregnated a human woman named Alcemene? Do you believe that this woman gave birth to a human son named Hercules? Do you believe that this man traveled the region performing miraculous feats which benefited his neighbors? Now, do you believe that after he was brutally murdered, this man rose into the heavens to take place next to his father as a god?

    Do you believe this story, or am I insane just proposing that you might believe such foolish myths held true by the ancient Greeks.

  46. Mentors? Of course. Besides that I am an ordained Pastor and used to be a Teacher (history and music). Thank God I taught my own children so they didn't get all the Jewish controlled propaganda in our schools.

    Please Luke, tell me about the true meaning of the Bible or do you do just like most people do and mimic their Judeo controlled pastor instead of reading the word for themselves and studying History for truth. Sorry about the "Jake" bit . I must have been thinking about my dog Jake at the time of typing.

    You call the Bible fiction, so now I am asking you to prove that if you can. I however do not believe it to be fiction because history and science has proved it to be true. But first prove the fictitious part to me.

    Sadly though you had no real rebuttal to my writings so far.I have studied the Bible, kj 1100 authorized version and the Septuagint which is what all Bibles are translated from. This I have done for thirty years and I do know the Bible and have researched history which upholds its truth. you say what you say without proof but really you fear truth and appear to be an appeaser , so the myth that the bible is fictitious is your only defense. Besides that i feel you have been grossly misinformed about the bible to the point you believe what you have heard without searching the truth for yourself. In that you are merely someone who is a follower and not a leader. your too afraid of the truth, therefore it is easier for you to call the truth fictitious without warrant.

  47. BTW one who claims to know certain truths would at least know what the true meaning of "Neighbor" is and the true meaning of the word "BASTARD" which btw does not mean illegitimate child but a cross bread child or a mongrel.

    And the word Beguiled in the Bible does not mean Eve ate an apple but means she was sexually seduced by a Mamzir.

    Luke you can't make arguments unless you know the topic for which you discuss or pretend to rebut. Simply calling something a "fairy tale " is a cop out for your ignorance on any subject.

    Perhaps your problem is willful ignorance and the "fairy tale " insinuation is your only escape. One with knowledge would provide a good rebuttal in his defense instead of creating the fairy tale escape. Sort of sounds like when your getting to close to the truth , Jews shout you down with the word "anti Semite or blacks shout you down with the word "racist. Both which have no more teeth as we are getting wise to them and their attempts to escape the truth with BS charges , such as you are doing.

    At any rate Luke, I have given my proof , now you prove that it is a fairy tale. Or you can simply appear to be under the spell of willful ignorance and simply claim it a fairy tale without proof.

  48. Also Luke, I noticed you quoted some Greek mythology . I believe you did this because I have quoted the Greek often. This I did because God Himself said He would trust the original scriptures of the Bible to the Greeks because they would never change or alter it like other races such as the JEWs who have thousands of times ( perverting the word of God for their gain) or the blacks, Mexicans and so on.

    Ala in all , the Greeks have kept the original transcripts of the Septuagint ( original bible transcripts) intact without changing them. By this we can achieve the truth of Gods word that was perverted in American bibles by Jewish Rabbi's pretending to translate the word they have no real knowledge of. For which they have perverted several scriptures on purpose in order to make the world believe they are the chosen when in fact they are the original anti-Christ and haters of Christians ( white), and the true enemies of GOD.

    The Greek is the foremost authority on the truth of Gods true word for mankind ( whites).

  49. How has history and science proven the Bible to be true? Yes, maybe it makes reference to actual events in history, but after all, its writers either lived through the events or were familiar with history themselves.

    you speak of science, and say that blacks are not of the same species. however, scientifically speaking, two animals that can breed and give birth to viable offspring is the definition of a species. furthermore, among real scientists, (sorry those who study the bible for evidence do not count), the theory that men have come out of the great rift valley of Africa, is fairly universally accepted. evolution is a well established and observable fact (not even a theory because the theory pertains only to the means), yet the bible says that god created man. there are many more examples of this nature.

    do you also believe that the world was created only thousands of years ago instead of billions?

    I cannot disprove the Bible, just like I cannot disprove the pastafarian flying spaghetti monster (hope you are familiar with the concept). how can one even try to disprove something which has absolutely no basis.

    if i tell you that invisible creatures called grantars which are undetectable by any human means run around this planet causing people do do bad things, how do you disprove that?

    how can I be following the teachings of a pastor if my pastor (i actually don't have a pastor) believes in god and I do not? you on the other hand, are following exactly what someone else has taught you (i.e. your mentor).

    i actually feel really bad for your children, and your congregation. it's awful to live life filled with so much hate and so much judgement towards others. knowing that it is either your parents or some other figure of authority in your life fed you the garbage you believe, i sort of feel sorry for you as well.

  50. As far as saying the Bible is a fairy tale being easy is concerned. It's actually easier to believe that it is the word of god and there is a god. This gives you an outline of your morality, dictates what is good and bad, gives you a reason for why things go good or bad. When you don't believe, you have to come to the realization that you, and nobody else, is responsible for your actions. I can't blame my problems on the jews or blacks like you can. I am responsible for my problems, for the harm that I cause, and it is my responsibility to do good. Not because a god told me to do so or not to, but because I believe it is the right thing to do. I also have nothing to hope for. You always hear religious individuals saying, I hope for this, or I will pray to god for that. If I want something to happen, I have to make sure it gets done.