The feminist are at it again, they are fabricating this phony war on woman. It does not exist; there is no real battle between the sexes. Now the website Care to Causes is now trying to demonize their enemies to their agenda. They are putting the Abortion clinics on high alert in Georgia and Nationwide because of two fires started at two separate abortion clinics. The police are saying it might be domestic terrorism in the war on woman. I would like to know, who stands to gain or benefit from two fires at two different abortion clinics four days apart in the State of Georgia?
The truth is pro life or pro family groups do not stand to gain starting fires at abortion clinics. This looks like an inside job as a way for these feminist groups to demonize their enemies and gain public sympathy. These pro-abortion groups are the only ones who stands the gain. Department of Homeland Security has designated pro life and pro family groups as possible domestic terrorist. Will they try to use an incident to justify more tyranny in the name of protecting the woman's right to choose? They need an enemy to demonize as an excuse to justify a bigger police state in the phony war on woman.
This is nothing new. Those black churches that were burned in the southern states were using these incidents to blame it on racist groups committing arson. When they investigated these arsons further, they uncovered something else. These black churches were abandoned and not used in years. Second, this was an insurance fraud to collect money by the church burning to the ground. The media generated hype had us believe it was the work of White racist when in reality was an inside job.
Remember when the Jewish woman cried about the NAZI swastika was on her dorm room door. There was a campaign to generate public sympathy using the NAZI holocaust. When the campus security put a camera in the dormitory caught the very woman playing the victim spray-painting a swastika on the door. This is why I am skeptical about these groups crying foul blaming their political rivals when an incident happens because it all might be an inside job all for the reason of demonizing their opponents.
This looks like an inside job. The pro-life groups have nothing to gain setting fires to abortion clinics. This does not look like the work of domestic terrorist, just another agent provocateur action to demonize the opposition. A possible classic textbook false flag operation
The truth is pro life or pro family groups do not stand to gain starting fires at abortion clinics. This looks like an inside job as a way for these feminist groups to demonize their enemies and gain public sympathy. These pro-abortion groups are the only ones who stands the gain. Department of Homeland Security has designated pro life and pro family groups as possible domestic terrorist. Will they try to use an incident to justify more tyranny in the name of protecting the woman's right to choose? They need an enemy to demonize as an excuse to justify a bigger police state in the phony war on woman.
This is nothing new. Those black churches that were burned in the southern states were using these incidents to blame it on racist groups committing arson. When they investigated these arsons further, they uncovered something else. These black churches were abandoned and not used in years. Second, this was an insurance fraud to collect money by the church burning to the ground. The media generated hype had us believe it was the work of White racist when in reality was an inside job.
Remember when the Jewish woman cried about the NAZI swastika was on her dorm room door. There was a campaign to generate public sympathy using the NAZI holocaust. When the campus security put a camera in the dormitory caught the very woman playing the victim spray-painting a swastika on the door. This is why I am skeptical about these groups crying foul blaming their political rivals when an incident happens because it all might be an inside job all for the reason of demonizing their opponents.
This looks like an inside job. The pro-life groups have nothing to gain setting fires to abortion clinics. This does not look like the work of domestic terrorist, just another agent provocateur action to demonize the opposition. A possible classic textbook false flag operation
Israel does the same thing. Palestinians gain NOTHING by shooting "missiles" into an empty field. Just to give Israel an excuse to Wipe Palestine off the map.
ReplyDeleteI doubt it. No historical precedent and historically it has always been the lone nutbag with a long paper trail. There's no money to be made, no gain to achieve. No. This time it is likely the same as it ever was.
ReplyDeleteNot saying false flag events do not occur...They most definitely do. 911, of course it was. But not all acts of terrorism are false flags. Abortion clinics??? Nah. They have nothing to gain.
"Those black churches that were burned in the southern states were using these incidents to blame it on racist groups committing arson. When they investigated these arsons further, they uncovered something else. These black churches were abandoned and not used in years. Second, this was an insurance fraud to collect money by the church burning to the ground."
ReplyDeleteOh?
You're claiming that no white racists ever bombed or burned any black churches? That smells like manure to me. And racist manure at that. You better be able to cite some pretty damn good evidence on that, or you should be ashamed of yourself.
You'd have more credibility if you didn't use "pro-life" to describe the "anti-sex" crowd, who object not only to abortion ("murder!" they cry), but also to contraception (who does THAT "murder???"). Funny too that "pro-life" folks also seem to be generally pro-death penalty, and pro war, which are both pretty "anti-life," wouldn't you say?
The folks you call "pro-abortion" are more "pro-contraception," but certainly are "pro-liberty" in making it each woman's individual right to think for herself and make a decision based on her own religious beliefs or moral code. That's why they call themselves "pro-choice."
By using the terms you use, you're trying to con people into defining the issue inaccurately.
That's called propaganda.
That's EXACTLY what you complain about the government (and others) doing.
Let's have ONE standard of honesty, shall we?
sj